The Risks of Including Infidelity Clauses in California Prenuptial Agreements
When planning for marriage, couples often consider a prenuptial agreement as a proactive step to outline the management and division of their assets should the marriage dissolve. Among the various provisions that can be included, one occasionally requested is the infidelity or cheating clause. However, the legal landscape in California, being a no-fault divorce state, presents unique challenges to the enforceability of such clauses.
In California, the concept of a no-fault divorce means that the court does not consider the reasons behind the dissolution of the marriage when dividing assets or determining alimony. The typical grounds for divorce, such as irreconcilable differences, do not include misconduct such as adultery. This principle is crucial in understanding why a court may not enforce an infidelity clause in a prenuptial agreement.
The Enforceability of Cheating Clauses
Cheating clauses, often seen as part of "lifestyle clauses" in prenuptial agreements, typically penalize a spouse financially if they are proven to have committed adultery. However, because such clauses attempt to introduce fault into the no-fault divorce framework, they are scrutinized and often found to be unreasonable by California courts. For an agreement to be enforceable, it must not only be entered into without duress or undue influence but also be fair and reasonable at the time of enforcement.
In the landmark 2002 case of Diosdado v. Diosdado, the California Court of Appeals invalidated a prenuptial agreement that included a cheating penalty, citing that it was contrary to the state's no-fault divorce principles. This case set a strong precedent, indicating that inserting an infidelity clause could risk the entire prenuptial agreement being deemed invalid.
Crafting a Valid Prenuptial Agreement
To ensure the effectiveness and enforceability of a prenuptial agreement in California, it is vital to craft terms that adhere to fairness and reasonableness and focus on provisions that are consistent with state laws and court preferences. Couples should concentrate on creating a comprehensive agreement that addresses financial responsibilities, division of assets, and potential alimony without delving into personal conduct clauses that the state may not uphold.
While the inclusion of an infidelity clause in a prenuptial agreement might seem appealing to some, the legal environment in California makes these clauses not only potentially unenforceable but also risky, as they could invalidate the entire agreement. As always, consulting with an experienced prenuptial attorney who understands the nuances of California's family law will provide the best guidance in crafting an agreement that is both fair and valid.
If you have questions or are considering a prenuptial agreement, we are here to help. We understand the nuances of California family law and can help you craft an agreement that protects your interests and complies with all legal requirements. Contact us today to schedule a free consultation.
Get Free Consultation
All content provided on this blog is for informational purposes only. We will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. These terms and conditions of use are subject to change at any time and without notice. The information provided here and the content on our website related to legal matters (“Information”) is provided for your private use and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult a licensed attorney if you need legal advice for a specific problem. The information provided here is not a substitute for legal advice from a qualified attorney licensed to practice in an appropriate jurisdiction.